Introduction
Mayavada is a doctrine which teaches that everything is illusion (maya=illusion, vada=teaching).
Mayavada philosophy rejects all forms and manifestations – as well as personality itself – as illusion.
Advocates of this – mayavadis, or advaita vedantists – say that ultimately everything is “one,” and that the perfection of life is to merge with the ultimate oneness and again become nameless, formless, and devoid of personality.
Mayavadi interpretations of scriptures like the Bhagavad-gita and the Srimad-Bhagavatam dismiss all names and forms of the Supreme Person as illusory, while emphasizing the impersonal aspect of the Absolute Truth.
Something more
Mayavadi philosophers believe that the Absolute Truth, being spread throughout the cosmic manifestation, has no personal form. But the standard Vedic version is that the Supreme Person is spread all over the cosmic manifestation by His energy. This energy is spiritual, but because it acts in the material world it is called maya, or illusory energy.
The Absolute Truth is understood in three phases—impersonal, localized, and as the Supreme Person. The Supreme Person’s impersonal feature, brahman, is subordinate to His personal aspect, as the sun’s rays are subordinate to the sun itself. Mayavada teachings accept only the impersonal Brahman as real, and think the Supreme Person, the source of Brahman, is illusory.
Chaitanya Mahaprabhu taught that those who present Mayavada interpretations of scripture are offensive to Krishna and should be avoided. This is because such persons deny Krishna’s existence as the Supreme Personality of Godhead, and claim that Krishna is as much an illusion as everything else.
A fire consists of three elements: heat and light, which are the energy of the fire, and the fire itself. Anyone can understand that the original fire is the reality and that the heat and light are simply the fire’s energy. Heat and light are the formless energies of fire, and in that sense they are unreal. Only the fire has form, and therefore it is the real form of the heat and light.
As Krishna says (Bhagavad-gita 9.4), “By Me, in My unmanifested form, this entire universe is pervaded.” Thus the impersonal conception of the Supreme Person is like the expansion of heat and light from a fire. Krishna also says that the entire material creation is resting on His energy—material, spiritual or marginal—but because His form is absent from the expansion of His energy, He is not personally present.
Another perspective
This philosophy was established by Sripad Sankaracarya, in order to refute Buddhistic doctrine.
The Mayavadis believe that the Supreme Truth is brahman or spiritual energy which is unlimited, without form, qualities, or activity. According to Mayavada philosophy, all living entities are one with brahman, but at present, are covered by illusion, and therefore temporarily seperated from brahman. When the illusion is gone, the living entity becomes again one with the brahman and loses its identity.
The main idea is that everything is God, meaning that you too are God but somehow or other you forgot that you were God.
Out of this perspective, the Mayavadis neither accept the form nor the personality of Krsna as absolute but as creation of maya. Therefore, Sri Caitanya Mahaprabhu called the Mayavadis the biggest offenders of Krsna.
Mayavada-philosophy is also spread under the name “Vedanta-philosophy”. The majority of all western philosophers (if they are not dogmatic followers of the Bible) who are studying Indian culture and philosophy also fall into this category because they do not differentiate between the higher, spiritual energy, and the lower, material energy. They do not have a proper understanding of the transcendent nature of God.
Since people in general do not have sufficient information about the transcendental form of God, they are easily influenced by Mayavada philosophy. Whenever we meet people who accept the Vedas we will find that it is not so difficult to establish the Personality of Godhead on the basis of sastra. Since the majority of people are neither interested in any proofs from the sastra and don’t recognize sastra as such, we have to establish Vaisnava philosophy on the basis of logic. There are some fatal defects in Mayavada philosophy which we should be able to recognize when confronted with it or otherwise have to deal with the subject:
- Since we possess individuality, it is not logical that our ultimate source doesn’t possess individuality. Since we can normally observe that personality is superior to an impersonal energy, we can conclude that personality is superior to impersonal energy. Since the Vedanta sutra explains that the Absolute Truth is the source of all existence, it must also be the source of personality and possess personality.
- The Mayavadis say that the brahman is manifested in a personal form in this material world. How can something personal be manifested from something impersonal? Where do we have an experience of such a phenomena? Lord Krsna explains in Bg 7:24 that this theory is extremely illogical and indicates a lack of intelligence.
- It is said that brahman is unchangeable. How then can it split into different living entities within the material world? And why should it do that? In Bhagavad-gita, Lord Krsna explains (15:7) that the living entities are eternal parts and parcels of the Supreme and states than individuality is an eternal principle (Bg 2:12).
- If we were all God, why is there so much suffering and ignorance in the world? Also, if we say that we are God but just temporarily covered by illusion, then illusion would be more powerful than God, which doesn’t make any sense.
- The speculation that Krsna’s body is material clearly indicates a complete misunderstanding regarding the transcendental appearance and nature of Krsna. Krsna’s body does not consist of matter and contains unlimited, varied energies and attracts even liberated personalities, who are free from material attachments. (SB 1.7.10)
- Reality according to Mayavada philosophy is beyond material form and duality. But they are erring in the premise that there is no spiritual form or variety. The negation of these facts is a materialistic concept and doesn’t provide us any information about spiritual reality.
- The desire to become one with God is called the “last snare of maya”. Because the Mayavadis got frustrated with their attempt to become the supreme enjoyer in this material world, they want to become one with the Supreme. This desire is illusory because the soul is by constitution Krsna’s servant. The Srimad Bhagavatam(10:2:32) explains that the misconception of the impersonalists is caused by an impure intelligence and that consequently their realizations are not ultimate and they are thus forced to fall down again to the material platform.
- The material world is not false (“brahma satyam, jagan mithya” is one of their favourite slogans)/ because the material world originates in the Absolute Truth, it is real but temporary. However, the belief that the material world is permanent is false-in other words the material world is real but temporary.
Buddhism in disguise
Padma Purana (Uttara, 263.7) says:
mayavadam asac chastram
pracchannam bauddham ucyate
Mayavada is a wrong doctrine and is said to be Buddhism in disguise
Siddhanta Ratnam
Loc 14117
Mayavada was propagated by Lord Siva
mayavadam asatcastam
praccanna bauddham isyate
mayaiva kathitam devi
kalau brahmana-rupina
O goddess, this philosophy is propagated by me in the form of a brahmana in the Age of Kali.
Padma Purana (Uttara, 263.7)
Siddhanta Ratnam loc. 14129
A commentary from advaita-vedanta.org
https://www.advaita-vedanta.org/archives/advaita-l/2010-November/025996.html
A verse in the Padma Purana,”Mayavadam asatcastam praccanna bauddham
isyate!mayaiva kathitam devi kalau brahmana rupina!!.
This verse has given rise to many controversies in the past,as an argument against “Shankaracharya”,who is branded as a “Praccanna Bauddha”,a “crypto Buddhist,or a “Buddhist under cover”. A verse before this says,”Mayavadam asatsastram mayaiva kathitam devi kalau Buddha rupina”.
The above verse is said to be by the God Shiva,to his consort Parvathi.
Gautamathe Buddha has also been branded as the one who was deluded by the ‘Asuri sampat”,and instructed his disciples differently, in various ways, contradicting one another in such a way that they also become deluded!.
In the Bhagawadgita also there are verses which condemn Buddhism. SriKrihna says,
“Svadharme nidhanam shreyah,Paradharmo bhayavahah”,
When Arjuna pleads that he will take sanyasa,by abandoning his arms.
Asuri sampat has been associated with the Charvaka siddhanta.”Asurim yonimapanna, mudha janmani janmani”.
It is said that Acharya Shankara took birth only to correct the position of Buddhism,and give a theistic explanation.
The interpolation must have been done by mischief by the later Vaishnava commentators. And also, it is not found in all the copies of the Padmapurana!
Regards,
N.Srikanta.
Post view 1223 times
