This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. Find sources: “Vedic priesthood” – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Priests of the Vedic religion are officiants of the yajna service. Yajna is an important part of Hinduism especially the Vedas.^[1] persons trained for the ritual and proficient in its practice, they were called ṛtvij (“regularly–sacrificing“).^{[citation needed]} As members of a social class, they were generically known as vipra “sage” or kavi “seer”. Specialization of roles attended the elaboration and development of the ritual corpus over time. Eventually a full complement of sixteen ṛtvijas became the custom for major ceremonies. The sixteen consisted of four chief priests and their assistants.^{[citation needed]}

Chief priests[edit]

The older references uniformly indicate the hotṛ as the presiding priest, with perhaps only the adhvaryu as his assistant in the earliest times. The phrase “seven hotars” is found more than once in the Rigveda. Hymn 2.1.2 of Rigveda states it as follows,

तवाग्ने होत्रं तव पोत्रमृत्वियं तव नेष्ट्रं त्वमग्निदृतायतः । तव प्रशास्त्रं त्वमध्वरीयसि ब्रह्मा चासि गृहपतिश्च नो दमे ॥२॥^[2]

Thine is the Herald’s task and Cleanser’s duly timed; Leader art thou, and Kindler for the pious man. Thou art Director, thou the ministering Priest: thou art the Brahman, Lord and Master in our home.

— Rigveda 2.1.2^[3]

The above hymn enumerate the priests as the hotṛ, potṛ, neṣṭṛ, agnīdh, prashāstṛ (meaning the maitrāvaruna) and adhvaryu.

• The hotṛ was the reciter of invocations and litanies. These could consist of single verses (ṛca), strophes (triples called tṛca or pairs called pragātha), or entire hymns (sukta), drawn from the ṛgveda. As each phase of the ritual required an invocation, the hotṛ had a leading or presiding role.^{[citation needed]}
• The adhvaryu was in charge of the physical details of the sacrifice (in particular the adhvara, a term for the Somayajna). According to Monier-Williams, the adhvaryu “had to measure the ground, to build the altar, to prepare the sacrificial vessels, to fetch wood and water, to light the fire, to bring the animal and immolate it,” among other duties.^{[citation needed]} Each action was accompanied by supplicative or benedictive formulas (yajus), drawn from the yajurveda. Over time, the role of the adhvaryu grew in importance, and many verses of the ṛgveda were incorporated, either intact or adapted, into the texts of the yajurveda.^[4]
• The udgātṛ was a chanter of hymns set to melodies (sāman) drawn from the sāmaveda. This was a specialized role in the major soma sacrifices: a characteristic function of the udgātṛ was to sing hymns in praise of the invigorating properties of soma pavamāna, the freshly pressed juice of the soma plant.^{[citation needed]}
• The brahman was the reciter of hymns from the atharvaveda who was largely silent and observes the procedures and uses Atharvaveda mantras to ‘heal’ it when mistakes have been made.

The term Brahman in the above hymn 2.1.2 refers to deity Agni of hymn 2.1.1.^[5]

The rgvedic Brahmanas, Aitareya and Kausitaki, specify seven hotrakas to recite shastras (litanies): hotṛ, brāhmanācchamsin, maitrāvaruna, potṛ, neṣṭṛ, agnīdh and acchāvāka. They also carry a legend to explain the origin of the offices of the subrahmanya and the grāvastut.^{[citation needed]}

Purohita[edit]

The requirements of the fully developed ritual were rigorous enough that only professional priests could perform them adequately.^{[citation needed]} Thus, whereas in the earliest times, the true sacrificer, or intended beneficiary of the rite, might have been a direct participant, in Vedic times he was only a sponsor, the yajamāna, with the hotṛ or brahman taking his stead in the ritual.^{[citation needed]} In this seconding lay the origins of the growing importance of the purohita (literally, “one who is placed in front”). It was not unusual for a purohita to be the hotṛ or brahman at a sacrifice for his master, besides conducting other more domestic (gṛhya) rituals for him also.^{[citation needed]} In latter days, with the disappearance of Vedic ritual practice, purohita has become a generic term for “priest”.^{[citation needed]}

Assistants[edit]

In the systematic expositions of the shrauta sutras,^[6] which date to the fifth or sixth century BCE, the assistants are classified into four groups associated with each of the four chief priests, although the classifications are artificial and in some cases incorrect:^{[citation needed]}

• With the hotṛ:
  • the maitrāvaruna
  • the acchāvāka
  • the grāvastut (praising the Soma stones)
• With the udgātṛ:
  • the prastotṛ (who chants the Prastâva)
  • the pratihartṛ (“averter”)
  • the subrahmanya
• With the adhvaryu:
  • the pratiprasthātṛ
  • the neṣṭṛ
  • the unnetṛ (who pours the Soma juice into the receptacles )
• With the brahman:
  • the brāhmanācchamsin
  • the agnīdh (priest who kindles the sacred fire)
  • the potṛ (“purifier”)

This last classification is incorrect, as the formal assistants of the brahman were actually assistants of the hotṛ and the adhvaryu.^{[clarification needed]}

Philological comparisons[edit]

This section does not cite any sources. Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (April 2015) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)

Comparison with the sacred texts of Zoroastrianism, a distinct religion with the same origins, shows the antiquity of terms for priests such as *atharwan (Vedic atharvan; cognate to Avestan āθrauuan / aθaurun) and *zhautar (Ved. hotar; Av. zaotar) “invoker, sacrificer”. While *zhautar is well understood, the original meaning of *atharwan is unknown. The word atharvan appears in the Rig Veda (e.g., in RV 6.16.13 where Agni is said to have been churned by Atharvan from the mind of every poet). In the Younger Avesta, āθrauuan / aθaurun appears in a context that suggests “missionary,” perhaps by metathesis from Indo-Iranian *arthavan “possessing purpose.” However, a recent theory indicates that Proto Indo-Iranian *atharwan likely represents a substrate word from the unknown language of the BMAC civilization of Central Asia. It can be analyzed as BMAC *athar- plus the Indo-Iranian possessive suffix *-wan, in which case *atharwan would be “one who possesses *athar“. Though the meaning of *athar is unknown, Pinault speculates that it meant “superior force” and connects it to the Tocharian word for “hero”. In the Upanishads, atharvan appears for example in atharvāngiras, a compound of atharvan and angiras, either two eponymous rishis or their family names.

In present-day Indian Zoroastrian (Parsi) tradition the word athornan is used to distinguish the priesthood from the laity (the behdin). These subdivisions (in the historical Indian context, castes), and the terms used to describe them, are relatively recent developments specific to Indian Zoroastrians and although the words themselves are old, the meaning that they came to have for the Parsis are influenced by their centuries-long coexistence with Hinduism. It appears then that the Indian Zoroastrian priests re-adopted the older āθrauuan / aθaurun (in preference to the traditional, and very well attested derivative āsron) for its similarity to Hinduism’s atharvan, which the Parsi priests then additionally assumed was derived from Avestan ātar “fire”. This folk-etymology, which may “have been prompted by what is probably a mistaken assumption of the importance of fire in the ancient Indo-Iranian religion” (Boyce, 1982:16).

The division of priestly functions among the Hotar, the Udgatar and the Adhvaryu has been compared to the Celtic priesthood as reported by Strabo, with the Druids as high priests, the Bards doing the chanting and the Vates performing the actual sacrifice.

See also[edit]

• Agnihotra
• Agnistoma
• Brahmin
• Namboothiri
• Śrāddha

Notes[edit]